After a day of working with #LogSeq, I like a bunch of what it has, but I'm thinking @qownnotes with its flaws, might be a better approach.
But, I really like the cross-linking, tags, and the formatting in LS and the keyboard-centric operations over QON, but QON produces clearing Markdown for what I use it. And it almost has the tagging I want, I just have to learn enough to fix the false positives with the tagging (and maybe get a open tag page going).
@dmoonfire what are false positives in tagging and what do you mean by an open tag page?
@patrizio I have a bunch of links already in my notes that talk about Mastodon folks (such as "@dmoonfire") or have octothorps tags in them (Hitachi TV model CY07 C#G9LXU1M), but when I use "@" or "#" in the settings for "@tag tagging in note text" script, it treats them as false positives and not really links.
I prefer "#" for hash tagging (well, plus pascal case instead of underscore case, but that is a different issue), but when I try either "@" or "#", I get a couple hundred not-tags.
@dmoonfire so we are talking about scripts for QOwnNotes like https://github.com/qownnotes/scripts/tree/master/in-note-text-tagging and https://github.com/qownnotes/scripts/tree/master/yaml-nested-tags. You could open issues or feature requests to the maintainers of those scripts or adapt the scripts yourself.
@dmoonfire feature requests are always welcome. 😉
@dmoonfire, most ideas that people have (or have seen somewhere else) are pretty good ideas.
@patrizio Yeah, but I don't like being annoying. That's how I got to be a maintainer in Atom and contributed to Tomboy. :) Of course, then I ran out of bandwidth but...
I'll put in a feature request.